Science and Evolution

As we briefly weave into the grand tapestry of life and how the fascinating realm of science intertwines with our existence, we’ll keep it simple and stick to basic, universally accepted scientific principles that are pretty fascinating.

Beginning with the Science of “Matter”: according to accepted science, all matter must have a beginning; otherwise, it would be “infinite”,  impossible to measure with no beginning and no end.

Regarding mathematical “infinity”, or “no beginning”: the deduction of world-renowned mathematician David Hilbert, acclaimed above Sir Isaac Newton, and one of the most influential figures in the 19th and 20th Century, is that “Infinity, is just an idea of the mind, that it is nowhere to be found in reality. It neither exists in nature nor provides a legitimate basis for rational thought”.

That being said, and simply put, science can not legitimately support the theory of evolution, because the “theory” ignores the beginning of the universe, earth, and more significantly it cannot explain how life on earth began.

The strongest point to the “evolution theory” vs. Creation, is that “primitive nucleic and amino acids, along with other building blocks “”COULD HAVE”” formed and organized themselves into a self-replicating, self-sustaining unit, thus laying a foundation for cellular biochemistry”.

So the theory of evolution is simply that, just a theory based solely on could haves, and might haves. It is void of any scientific givens like natural laws, constants, or quantum rules. The bottom line on evolution, it is absent of any solid scientific foundation, and therefore poses no viable case to support it.

“A baseless argument against something, does not make a case for something else.”

In the branch of Pysical Sciences: Thermodynamics deals with the relationships between all forms of energy. The First Law of Thermodynamics is; You can not get something from nothing.

Aristotle, one of the greatest philosophers who ever lived and the first genuine scientist in human history.  He invented the field of formal logic, and concluded “the existence of the universe needs an explanation as it could not have come from nothing”. He added, “There needs to be a cause for the universe. Nothing comes from nothing, so since there is something, there must have been some other something, that is its cause.”

Aristotle ruled out an infinite regression of causes, which led him to the conclusion that there must be a first cause, “a beginning.”  Likewise, as with the law of motion, he asserted, “there must have been a first mover because motion requires force”. He then argued that there cannot be an infinite series of “moved Movers” as the series cannot go on forever and so it must come to a halt in some X that is a cause of motion but does not move itself-an “unmoved mover.”

Cosmology: In 1965, world leading Cosmologists and Astronomers came to an agreement that was based on mathematical formulas and models. They concluded that all creation of the universe started with a cataclysmic single event, which English astronomer Fred Hoyle, famously coined the term “Big Bang”. Their conclusion: that the universe was born as a very hot, very dense, single point in space, “a beginning”.

Now that you have been presented with basic scientific “givens” and deductions from some of the most respected minds in math and science, of an irrefutable “beginning” to the universe.

Do you believe the Cosmos, Earth, and all Life was created by the intelligent design of God?